--- title: Staking on Polkadot description: Overview of staking and Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS) in Polkadot, including validator selection, rewards, and security mechanisms. url: https://developer.polkadot.com/wiki/learn/learn-staking/ word_count: 5109 token_estimate: 7842 version_hash: sha256:adfe5ce3519eb7c7c9f339d9f0b07ee50b543ce2cfb77067ec90df60c2b5ab87 last_updated: 2026-11-01T15:55:43+00:00 --- !!!tip "New to Staking?" Explore Polkadot with a secure and user-friendly wallets listed on the [wallet options page](how-to/where-to-store-dot.md) and start your staking journey. Discover the [Staking Dashboard](https://staking.polkadot.cloud/) and check this [extensive article list](../general/dashboards/staking-dashboard.md) to help you get started. The dashboard supports [Ledger](../general/ledger.md) devices natively and does not require an extension or wallet as an interface. !!!info "Stake through Nomination Pools" The minimum amount required to become an active nominator (i.e. [the minimum active bond](../general/chain-state-values.md)) and earn rewards is variable. If you have less tokens than the minimum active bond and still want to participate in staking, you can join the nomination pools with a [minimal bond](../general/chain-state-values.md) and earn staking rewards. For additional information, check out [this blog post](https://polkadot.network/blog/nomination-pools-are-live-stake-natively-with-just-1-dot/). Check the wiki doc on [nomination pools](learn-nomination-pools.md) for more information. ## Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Blockchain networks use [consensus](../general/faq.md#why-do-we-need-consensus) mechanisms to finalize blocks on the chain. Consensus is the process of agreeing on something, in this case, the progression of the blockchain or how blocks are added to the chain. Consensus consists of two actions: - **Block production**, i.e. the way multiple blocks candidates are produced, and - **Block finality**, i.e. the way only one block out of many candidates is selected and added to the canonical chain (see [this](./learn-consensus.md#probabilistic-vs-provable-finality) article for more information about finality). Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) are well-known mechanisms used to reach consensus in a secure and trustless way on public blockchains, where there are many participants who do not know each other (and probably never will). In PoW, network security relies on the fact that the miners who are responsible for adding blocks to the chain must compete to solve difficult mathematic puzzles to add blocks - a solution that has been criticized for the wastage of energy. For doing this work, miners are typically rewarded with tokens. In PoS networks like Polkadot, the security of the network depends on the amount of capital locked on the chain: the more the capital locked, the lower the chance of an attack on the network, as the attacker needs to incur a heavy loss to orchestrate a successful attack (more on this later on). The process of locking tokens on the chain is called **staking**. Similar to the miners in PoW networks, PoS networks have **validators**, but they do not have to compete with each other to solve mathematical puzzles. They are instead pre-selected to produce the blocks based on the stake backing them. Token holders can lock funds on the chain and for doing so, they are getting **staking rewards**. There is thus an economic incentive for token holders to become active participants who contribute to the economic security and stability of the network. PoS networks in general are therefore more inclusive than PoW networks, as participants do not need to have either technical knowledge about blockchain technology or experience in running mining equipment. PoS ensures that everybody participating in the staking process has "skin in the game" and thus can be held accountable. In case of misbehavior, participants in the staking process can be punished or [**slashed**](./learn-offenses.md), and depending on the gravity of the situation, their stake can be partly or fully confiscated by the network. It is not in a staker's economic interest to orchestrate an attack and risk losing tokens. Any to get rewarded, and the PoS network rewards good behavior and punishes bad behavior. ## Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS) Polkadot implements [Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS)](./learn-consensus.md#nominated-proof-of-stake), a relatively novel and sophisticated mechanism to select the validators who are allowed to participate in its [consensus](learn-consensus.md) protocol. NPoS encourages token holders to participate as **nominators**. Any potential validators can indicate their intention to be a validator candidate. Their candidacies are made public to all nominators, and a nominator, in turn, submits a [capped list of candidates](../general/chain-state-values.md) that it supports, and the network will automatically distribute the stake among validators in an even manner so that the economic security is maximized. In the next era, a certain number of validators having the highest backing get elected and become active. For more information about the election algorithm go to [this](learn-phragmen.md) page on the wiki or [this](https://research.web3.foundation/Polkadot/protocols/NPoS/Paper) research article. As a nominator, a [minimum bond](../general/chain-state-values.md) is required to submit an intention to nominate, which can be thought of as registering to be a nominator. Note that in NPoS the stake of both nominators and validators can be [slashed](./learn-offenses.md). For an in-depth review of NPoS see [this](https://research.web3.foundation/Polkadot/protocols/NPoS/Overview) research article. !!!caution "Minimum Nomination to Receive Staking Rewards" [The minimum nomination intent](../general/chain-state-values.md) does not guarantee staking rewards. The nominated amount has to be greater than [minimum active nomination](../general/chain-state-values.md), which is a dynamic value that can be much higher than the minimum nomination intent. This dynamic value depends on the amount of tokens being staked, in addition to the selected nominations. The number of nominators included in the election solution of any given era is capped (approximately 22,500 on Polkadot), because the optimal validator selection must be computed within a single block's execution time. This is the reason the minimum active bond is dynamic: it is effectively set by the stake of the lowest-ranked electing nominator. Submitting a nomination intent above the strict minimum only adds an account to a waitlist for this electing subset, providing flexibility when higher-staked nominators unbond. Accounts whose stake falls below this dynamic minimum can still earn rewards by joining a [nomination pool](learn-nomination-pools.md). ### Nominating Validators Nominating requires 2 actions: - Locking tokens on-chain. - Selecting a set of validators, to whom these locked tokens will automatically be allocated to. How many tokens you lock up is completely up to you - as are the validators you wish to select. The action of locking tokens is also known as **bonding**. You can also refer to your locked tokens as your bonded tokens, or staked tokens. Likewise, selecting validators is also known as backing or nominating validators. These terms are used interchangeably by the community. From now on locked tokens will be referred to as bonded tokens. Once the previous 2 steps are completed and you are nominating, your bonded tokens could be allocated to one or more of your selected validators, and this happens every time the active validator set changes. This validator set is updated every era. Unlike other staking systems, Polkadot automatically chooses which of your selected validators will be backed by your bonded tokens. Selecting a group of validators increases your chances of consistently backing at least one who is active. This results in your bonded tokens being allocated to validators more often, which means more network security and more rewards. This is in strong contrast to other staking systems that only allow you to back one validator; if that validator is not active, you as a staker will also not be. Polkadot's nomination model solves this. It uses tools ranging from election theory to game theory to discrete optimization, to develop an efficient validator selection process that offers fair representation and security, thus avoiding uneven power and influence among validators. The election algorithms are based on the Proportional Justified Representation (PJR) methods like [Phragmen](learn-phragmen.md). For more information about PJR methods visit [this](https://research.web3.foundation/Polkadot/protocols/NPoS/Overview) research article. ### Eras and Sessions The stake from nominators is used to increase the number of tokens held by such candidates, increasing their chance of being selected by the election algorithm for block production during a specific **era**. An era is a period of 24 hours (6 hours on Kusama) during which an **active set** of validators is producing blocks and performing other actions on the chain. This means that not all validators are in the active set and such set changes between eras. Each era is divided into 6 epochs or **sessions** during which validators are assigned as block producers to specific time frames or **slots**. This means that validators know the slots when they will be required to produce a block within a specific session, but they do not know all the slots within a specific era. Having sessions adds a layer of security because it decreases the chance of having multiple validators assigned to a slot colluding to harm the network. ### Staking Rewards Validators who produce a block are rewarded with tokens, and they can share rewards with their nominators. Both validators and nominators can stake their tokens on chain and receive staking rewards at the end of each era. The staking system pays out rewards equally to all validators regardless of stake. Thus, having more stake in a validator does not influence the amount of block rewards it receives. This avoids the centralization of power to a few validators. There is a probabilistic component in the calculation of rewards, so they may not be exactly equal for all validators. In fact, during each era validators can earn **era points** by doing different tasks on chain. The more the points, the higher the reward for a specific era. This promotes validators' activity on chain. To know more about era points, and how and on which basis they are distributed visit the [dedicated page](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/staking-mechanics/rewards.md). Distribution of the rewards is pro-rata to all stakers after the validator's commission is deducted. ### Skin in the game when Staking The security of PoS networks depends on the amount of staked tokens. To successfully attack the network, a malicious actor would need to accrue a large number of tokens or would need different participants to collude and act maliciously. If there is an attack in the case of NPoS, both the validator(s) and nominators will be slashed resulting in their stake being partially or fully confiscated by the network and then deposited to the treasury. There is little interest for a rational network participant to act in a harmful way because NPoS ensures that all participants can be held accountable for their bad actions. In NPoS, validators are paid equal rewards regardless of the amount of stake backing them, thus avoiding large payouts to few large validators which might lead to centralization. ## Being a Nominator ### Tasks and Responsibilities of a Nominator **Validators.** Since validator slots are limited, most of those who wish to stake their tokens and contribute to the economic security of the network will be nominators, thus here we focus on the role of nominators. However, it is worth mentioning that validators do most of the heavy lifting: they run the validator nodes and manage [session keys](https://research.web3.foundation/Polkadot/security/keys/session), produce new block candidates in [BABE](./learn-consensus.md#block-production-babe), vote and come to consensus in [GRANDPA](./learn-consensus.md#finality-gadget-grandpa), validate the state transition function of parachains, and possibly some other responsibilities regarding data availability and [XCM](learn-xcm.md). For more information, you can take a look at the [validator docs](learn-validator.md) to understand what you need to do as a validator. If you want to become a validator you can consult [this](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/requirements.md#running-a-validator) guide. **Nominators.** Nominators have far fewer responsibilities than validators. These include selecting validators and monitoring their performance, keeping an eye on changing commission rates (a validator can change commission at any time), and general health monitoring of their validators' accounts. Thus, while not being completely set-it-and-forget-it, a nominator's experience is relatively hands-off compared to that of a validator, and even more with [nomination pools](./learn-nomination-pools.md). For more information, you can take a look at the nominator [guide](learn-nominator.md) to understanding your responsibilities as a nominator. If you want to become a nominator, see [this](../learn/learn-nominator.md) guide. If you are a beginner and would like to securely stake your tokens using the Polkadot Developer Interface, refer to [this](how-to/stake-nominate.md) article. The tutorial presented in the article is demonstrated on Polkadot, but the procedure is the same for Kusama. !!!info "Polkadot Staking Dashboard" The [Staking Dashboard](https://staking.polkadot.cloud/) provides a more user-friendly alternative to staking. See the [Staking Dashboard overview](../general/dashboards/staking-dashboard.md) and the [dashboard documentation](https://docs.staking.polkadot.cloud/) to learn how to stake with it. **Pools.** Pools are "built" on top of NPoS to provide a very low barrier to entry to staking, without sacrificing Polkadot's strict security model. ### Selection of Validators The task of choosing validators is not simple, as it should take into account nominator reward and risk preferences. Ideally one aims to maximize the reward-to-risk ratio by maximizing rewards and minimizing risks, with sometimes having to compromise between the two, as minimizing risks might decrease rewards as well. Nominators should pay attention, especially to six criteria when nominating validators (not in order of importance): - recent history of the era points earned across eras - validator's self stake (shows skin in the game) - total stake backing the validator (which is the sum of self stake and the stake coming from nominators) - commission fees (i.e. how much validators charge nominators) - verified identity - previous slashes The diagram below shows how the selection of those criteria affects the reward-to-risk ratio. ![rewards and risks diagram](../assets/reward-risk.png) #### Validator Selection Criteria To maximize rewards and minimize risk, one could select those validators that: - have era points above average (because they will get more rewards for being active), - have the total stake backing the validator below the average active validator stake (because they will pay out more rewards per staked token), - have high own stake (because if slashed they have something to lose), - have low commission fees but not 0% (because it makes sense that for doing the heavy lifting, validators ask for a small commission), - have on-chain registered identity (because it adds a layer of trust and possibly provides access to their website and contact details), - and have not been slashed (meaning that their on-chain behavior is genuine). #### Network Providers For successful operation, a Validator node should always be ensured to meet the required [software, hardware, and network bandwidth specifications](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/requirements.md#minimum-hardware-requirements). Understandably, most of the validator nodes run on cloud service providers that guarantee high hardware specifications and high levels of availability and connectivity. Keep in mind that a validator in the active set is supposed to be fully online and available for producing blocks. If the active validator node goes offline due to network interruptions or a power outage, that validator will get fewer rewards. !!!tip "Checking Validators using Network Providers" You can connect your stash account to the [Polkawatch app](https://polkawatch.app/). The app will show your rewards earned in the past 60 eras divided by network provider and country. You will be able to see networks used by each validator and verify if your validators are using providers who support PoS. This is also a great tool to explore how decentralized your nominations are and act accordingly. #### Keeping Track of Nominated Validators !!!caution "Nominators must periodically check their validators" Nominating is _not_ a "set and forget" operation. The whole NPoS system is dynamic and nominators should periodically monitor the performance and reputation of their validators. Failing to do so could result in applied slashes and/or rewards not being paid out, possibly for a prolonged period. Although the theory can be used as a general guideline, in practice it is more complicated and following the theory might not necessarily lead to the desired result. Validators might have the total stake backing them below average, low commission and above average era points in one era and then have a different profile in the next one. Selection based on the criteria like on-chain identity, slash history and low commission make the staking rewards deterministic. But some criteria vary more than others, with era points being the most variable and thus one of the key probabilistic components of staking rewards. Part of this probability is directly related to the fact that a validator can produce blocks for a parachain (i.e. para-validators) or the relay chain, with para-validators earning more era points per unit time (see [this](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/staking-mechanics/rewards.md#era-points) page for more information). The role can switch between sessions, and you can look at [the staking tab on the Polkadot Developer Interface](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Fpolkadot-asset-hub-rpc.polkadot.io#/staking-async) to know which validator is producing blocks for the relay chain or parachains. It is not recommended to change nominations because of the low era points of a validator in a single era. Variability in rewards due to the era points should level out over time. If a validator consistently gets era points below average, it makes sense to nominate a better-performing validator for the health of the network and increased staking rewards. See [this](how-to/choose-validators.md) article to understand in detail how to select the set of validators to nominate. ### Stash Account and Staking Proxy Two different accounts can be used to securely manage your funds while staking. - **Stash:** This account holds funds bonded for staking, but delegates some staking functions to a staking proxy account. You may actively participate in staking with a stash private key kept in a cold wallet like Ledger, meaning it stays offline all the time. Having a staking proxy will allow you to sign most staking-related transactions with the proxy instead of using your Ledger device. This will allow you: - to avoid carrying around your Ledger device just to sign staking-related transactions, and - to keep the transaction history of your stash clean - **Staking Proxy:** This account acts on behalf of the stash account, signalling decisions about nominating and validating. It can set preferences like commission (for validators) and the staking rewards payout account. The earned rewards can be bonded (locked) immediately for bonding on your stash account, which would effectively compound the rewards you receive over time. You could also choose to have them deposited to a different account as a free (transferable) balance. Staking proxies only need sufficient funds to pay for the transaction fees. !!!warning Never leave a high balance on a proxy account which are usually "hot" as their private key is stored on the device (PC, phone) and it is always exposed to the internet for potential hacks and scams. It is good practice to deposit rewards on the stash account or to send them to another account on a cold wallet. ![staking](../assets/stash-and-staking-proxy.png) This hierarchy of separate keys for stash and staking accounts was designed to add a layer of protection to nominators and validator operators. The more often one exposes and uses a private key, the higher its vulnerability for hacks or scams. So, if one uses a key for multiple roles on a blockchain network, it is likely that the account can get compromised. Note that the damage linked to stolen private keys is different depending on the type of account derivation. In the case of soft derivation, all derived accounts are compromised. More information about account derivation can be found [here](./learn-account-advanced.md#derivation-paths). !!!info For Ledger users staking directly on Ledger Live, there is no option to use separate stash and staking proxy accounts. Ledger devices are now supported in [SubWallet](https://www.subwallet.app/download.html), [Talisman](https://talisman.xyz/), and [PolkaGate](https://polkagate.xyz/) extension. Users can import their Ledger accounts in the extension and use them as a stash in staking. You can find more information about, SubWallet, Talisman, PolkaGate and other wallets that officially secured funding from the treasury [here](https://polkadot.com/ecosystem). ### Claiming Staking Rewards Note that Kusama runs approximately 4x as fast as Polkadot, except for block production times. Polkadot will also produce blocks at approximately six-second intervals. Rewards are calculated per era (approximately six hours on Kusama and twenty-four hours on Polkadot). These rewards are calculated based on era points, which have a probabilistic component. In other words, there may be slight differences in your rewards from era to era, and even amongst validators in the active set at the same time. These variations should cancel out over a long enough timeline. See the page on [Validator Payout Guide](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/staking-mechanics/rewards.md). !!!info "Staking Rewards" You must claim your staking rewards from Polkadot Hub, not the relay chain. The distribution of staking rewards to the nominators is not automatic and needs to be triggered by someone. Typically the validators take care of this, but anyone can permissionlessly trigger rewards payout for all the nominators whose stake has backed a specific validator in the active set of that era. Staking rewards are kept available for [a limited amount of time](../general/chain-state-values.md). Staking rewards are claimed on Asset Hub. For more information on why this is so, see the page on [simple payouts](learn-staking-advanced.md). !!!info "Payouts" Payouts are unclaimed rewards waiting to be paid out to both validators and nominators. If you go to the Staking payouts page on [Polkadot-JS](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Fpolkadot-asset-hub-rpc.polkadot.io#/staking-async), you will see a list of all validators that you have nominated in the past 84 eras and for which you have not yet received a payout. The payout page is visible only to stakers. Each validator as well as their nominators have the option to trigger the payout for all unclaimed eras. Note that this will pay everyone who was nominating that validator during those eras. Therefore, you may not see anything in this tab, yet still have received a payout if somebody (generally, but not necessarily, another nominator or the validator operator) has triggered the payout for that validator for that era. !!!warning "Time limit to claim staking rewards" If nobody claims your staking rewards within 84 eras, then you will not be able to claim them and they will be lost. Additionally, if the validator unbonds all their own stake, any pending payouts will also be lost. Rewards can be directed to the same account used to sign the payout or to a completely unrelated account. It is also possible to top-up / withdraw some bonded tokens without having to un-stake all staked tokens. If you wish to know if you received a payout, you will have to check via a block explorer. See [the relevant page](how-to/see-staking-rewards.md) for details. For specific details about validator payouts, please see [this guide](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/staking-mechanics/rewards.md). ### Chilling Chilling is the act of stepping back from any nominating or validating. It can be done by a validator or nominator at any time, taking effect in the next era. Chilling can be validator-initiated, e.g. if there is a planned outage in the validator's surroundings or hosting provider, and the validator wants to exit to protect themselves against slashing. Chilling will keep the validator active in the current era, but will move them to the inactive set in the next. The validator will not lose their nominators. For more on chilling, see the [How to Chill](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/operational-tasks/pause-validating.md) page on the main website. ### Why and Why not to Stake? ### Pros of Staking - Earn rewards for contributing to the network's security through staking. - Low barrier of entry through [Nomination Pools](learn-nomination-pools.md). - Can choose [multiple validators](../general/chain-state-values.md) which can help to decentralize the network through the sophisticated [NPoS system](./learn-consensus.md#nominated-proof-of-stake) - 85% of inflation/year of the tokens is primarily intended for staking rewards. Check the [inflation](learn-DOT.md#dot-inflation) section on the Wiki for more information. ### Cons of Staking - Tokens will be locked during the [unbonding period](../general/chain-state-values.md) and no rewards will be earned if you unbond. - Possible punishment in case of the active validator found to be misbehaving (see [slashing](./learn-offenses.md)). - Lack of liquidity i.e. You would not be able to use the tokens for participating in crowdloans or transfer them to different account etc. #### Unbonding Period Length The [unbonding period](../general/chain-state-values.md) provides a safety net for slashing offenses identified in [past eras](https://research.web3.foundation/Polkadot/security/slashing/npos#slashing-in-past-eras), which can hold the respective validators and their nominators accountable. The unbonding period is crucial in mitigating ex post facto slashing, particularly in guarding against long-range attacks. When a client encounters a chain finalized by [GRANDPA](./learn-consensus.md#finality-gadget-grandpa) that originates more than one [unbonding period](../general/chain-state-values.md) in the past, it lacks the security of slashing protection. Essentially, this period establishes a cadence for synchronizing with the chain or acquiring a checkpoint within a timeframe that engenders trust. It's worth noting that while the choice of [unbonding period length](../general/chain-state-values.md) is somewhat arbitrary, it unquestionably provides a higher level of security compared to a shorter period. ## How many Validators? The top bound on the [number of validators](../general/chain-state-values.md) has not been determined yet, but should only be limited by the bandwidth strain of the network due to peer-to-peer message passing. The estimate of the number of validators that Polkadot will have at maturity is around 1000, while Kusama is already operating at this threshold. ## Why am I not receiving rewards? Nominating is not a set-and-forget action. Nominators need to monitor their nominations and ensure they are eligible to receive staking rewards. Otherwise, they would be risking their funds to secure the chain with no reward. If you are bonding significantly more than the Minimum Active Bond and yet not receiving rewards, your nominations are all waiting, or your active validator has 100% commission. However, if you bond funds close to the Minimum Active Bond, there could be several possibilities for not receiving staking rewards. The table below can be used to troubleshoot why you might not be receiving staking rewards using Polkadot Developer Interface. Rewards also do not begin immediately after nominating. A new nomination only starts earning once the stake is applied to a validator that enters the active set at the next election, which can take up to roughly 48 hours (one to two eras). In addition, unless the amount staked is very large, in each era a nominator's entire stake typically backs only a single active validator rather than all selected validators; having multiple inactive or waiting validators is expected and not a problem as long as at least one is active. | Nomination Status | What's happening? | Causes | What to do? | | :---------------------------------------------------: | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------: | :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------: | :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------: | | Nominated validators are all in waiting status. | Your stake has not been assigned to any of the nominated validators. You cannot earn rewards, nor be slashed in that era. | Waiting validators are not in the active set in the current era and the stake backing them is not used to secure the network. In simple words, NPoS "does not see them". | Change your nominations. Try to select validators (with reasonable commission) that have high chances to end up in the active set. | | You have some inactive, and some waiting nominations. | Validators shown as "Inactive" in your staking dashboard are still in the active set and are producing blocks in the current era, but your stake has not been assigned to any of them. You will not earn rewards if your stake is not backing an active validator. In this case, you cannot be slashed either. | **Scenario 1:** You have bonded less than the Minimum Active Bond. **Scenario 2:** You have more than the Minimum Active Bond, but your account is at the tail end of the [bags list](learn-staking-advanced.md#bags-list) and within your bag there are accounts with less stake than you, in front of you. | **Scenario 1:** Try bonding more funds. **Scenario 2:** Try to put your account in front of the accounts with less stake than you. Instructions available [here](learn-staking-advanced.md) | !!!tip "Join a Nomination Pool" By joining a [nomination pool](learn-nomination-pools.md) that is active and earning rewards, you can start earning staking rewards with as low as 1 DOT. The nomination pools typically have a dedicated pool operator who ensures that the pool's stake is always backing an active validator and is receiving rewards. !!!info "Bags List & Minimum Active Bond" You can find information about why you might not receive staking rewards on [this page](learn-staking.md) and [this video tutorial](https://youtu.be/hIIZRJLrBZA). ## Staking FAQ !!!info See [this page](learn-staking.md) for the FAQs about staking. ## Resources - [How Nominated Proof of Stake will work in Polkadot](https://medium.com/web3foundation/how-nominated-proof-of-stake-will-work-in-polkadot-377d70c6bd43) - Blog post by Web3 Foundation researcher Alfonso Cevallos covering NPoS in Polkadot. - [Validator setup](../../node-infrastructure/run-a-validator/operational-tasks/general-management.md#secure-your-validator) - [Polkadot validator selector tool](https://decentradot.com/polkadot-validator-selector/) - A tool that helps nominators find reliable validators that meet quality-control criteria, including commission rates, verified identity, etc. --- !!!info "Polkadot-JS Guides" If you are an advanced user, see the [Polkadot-JS guides about staking](./learn-guides-nominator.md). ## How-to guides - [How to Unstake Your Tokens](how-to/unstake-tokens.md) - [How Do I Stake (Nominate) on Polkadot?](how-to/stake-nominate.md) - [How to See My Staking Rewards](how-to/see-staking-rewards.md)